Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to compare comparative air power options: tudy among the scientific and educational staff of the Air University, Department of Specialty Education Aviation and Air Students of the Higher National Defense University who have a good knowledge about the use of air power inclassic air power tactics, information warfare, military deception. And the application of vague threats with unknown capabilities in an asymmetric space to deal with potential threats. Research Methods, It is a field and a survey. In a field s a war in the field Have asymmetry, by providing a suitable questionnaire, the results obtained using Delphi research methods for Standardized and analyzed from the operational research process of hierarchical analysis or AHP method. This research, impact variables Training criteria, effectiveness, operational efficiency and equipment technology in the hypothesis, ie four options of asymmetric power approach Was selected and after standardization was statistically analyzed, which resulted in rejecting the hypothesis of the effect of application. Classic air power tactics and confirmation of three other options: information warfare, military deception, and the use of vague threats with capability Unknown in the field of asymmetry and also determining the importance and preference of the above options according to the four criteria of education, Effectiveness, operational efficiency and equipment technology.
)
