1
Corresponding Author, Assistant Professor, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2
Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Comparative Management and Development, Allameh Tabatabaie University, Tehran, Iran
3
MA in Law and Criminology, Islamic Azad University
Abstract
The UN Security Council is the only authority to prescribe the right to legal use of force on the basis of legal principles and rules. The 1937 Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of Terrorism (Geneva Convention) is the first international convention on terrorism. The process and mechanisms needed to define and delineate counterterrorism in international law are very slow. The US government has often used the Security Council mechanism, and otherwise, by force or concluding incomplete treaties with some countries, to justify its illegal actions internationally. The assassination is considered to be the most effective senior military official in command of the Takfiri Counter-Terrorism Front in the US-led region, under the direct command of the US President. The following article examines the assassination of General Suleimani for violating the principles of international and domestic law. This article states that citing a defense by the United States lacks the necessary elements to assign action to Iran. The claim of preventive defense is also not approved by international judicial custom. The perspective of international lawyers not only confirms the matter, but also denies it and opposes it. The US military attack on January 3, was contrary to the Iraqi -US security agreement and the Roman statute, and is a case of violations and violations.
آقایی، قاسم (1383)،مداخله بشردوستانه از ممنوعیت تا ضرورت، نشریه پژوهش حقوق و سیاست، سال ششم، شماره 11.
رمضانی قوامآبادی،محمدحسین؛ پیری، حیدر (1397)، مشروعیت مداخله نیروهای ائتلاف علیه داعش در عراق و سوریه در چارچوب حقوق بینالملل، مجله حقوقی بینالمللی، ش 58.
رستمینژاد، امید (1393)، بررسی نقش مکاتب فلسفی حقوق بینالملل در شکلگیری قواعد آمره بینالمللی با تأکید بر اصل منع توسل به زور، پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه حقوق و علوم سیاسی.
شریفی، محسن (1382)،تحول مفهوم دفاع مشروع در حقوق بینالملل با تأکید بر تحولات بعد از 11 سپتامبر 2001، سیاست خارجی، سال هفدهم، شماره 1.
شفیعی، محمد (1375)،بررسی مشروعیت دخالتهای نظامی بشردوستانه از دیدگاه حقوق بینالملل، مجله حقوقی دفتر خدمات حقوقی بینالملل، شماره 20.
صادقی حقیقی، دیدخت (1381)،مروری اجمالی بر اقدامات مجمع عمومی و شورای امنیت در مقابله با تروریسم بینالمللی، مجله اطلاعات سیاسی ـ اقتصادی، سال هفدهم، شماره سوم و چهارم.
طباطبایی لطفی، سیداحمد؛ شارق، زهراسادات (1395)، بررسی مشروعیت عملکرد ائتلاف ضدداعش ازمنظر حقوق بینالملل در سوریه، فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق عمومی، دوره 46، ش 1.
ضیایی بیگدلی، محمدرضا (1380)،نگرشی نو به مفهوم مداخله بشردوستانه، مجله پژوهش حقوق و سیاست، سال سوم، شماره 5.
عباسیاشلقی، مجید (1380)،مداخله بشردوستانه و اصل عدم مداخله، مجله اطلاعات سیاسی ـ اقتصادی، شماره 169 و 170.
فرهادینیا، حمید (1374)،مداخله بشردوستانه، بیم و امیدها، مجله اطلاعات سیاسی ـ اقتصادی، شماره 91 و 92.
کاسسه، آنتونی (1380)،مشروعیت بینالمللی اقدامات بشر دوستانه قهرآمیز در جامعه جهانی، ترجمه جعفر سروری، مجله اطلاعات سیاسی ـ اقتصادی، شماره 169 و 170.
Claypool,vicki Hesli, (2020),is the killing of Qasem soleimani morally Acceptable ?,CT,January,7,www.presscitizen.com>contributers>gust-editorials>2020/01/07
Dorsay,james M.,(2020),killing irans Qasem soleimani:Rule of law or rule of the jungle?,jauary7,https://wwwredressonline.com/2020/01/killing –irans-qassim-soleimani-rule-of-law-or-rule-of-the-jungel/
oconnell,mary ellen,(2020),the killing of soleimani and international law, European jornal international law, published an 6 january . Available at www.ejiltalk.org.
shaw, Malcolm n ,.(2008), international law , Cambridge university press , sixth edition.
swart,mia,(2020),to stop a war : did soleimani killing violate international law?,expert Agree use of self –defent as justification for killing soleimani requires proof of imminent attack , at https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/01/stop-war-soleimani-killing-violate-international-law-200105050718644.htmi
gerand challand & arnaud blln, the history of terrorism :from antiquity to al qaeda , translated by Edward scheider ,kaathryn pulver and jesse browmer ,university of California press,2007.
amnesty international isral and the occupied teeritories-state assassination and other unlawful killings ,2001
melzer n., targetedkilling in international law , oxford university press, new York (2008),(DOLUS Directus)
parker e.r.& naccarat t.e.,targeting suddam and sons:u.s policy against assassination university of the pacific , mcgeorge school of law,(2003)
djamalove f., targeted killing under international sui generis framework , a master (ll.m)thesis, university of toronto(canada)(2008)
international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia,prosecutor v. dusko tadic (a/k/a dule), decision on the defense motion for interlocutory appeal an jurision of & October 1995, no .it-94-1-ar72, para.70http://www.iilj.org/courses/documents/prosecutor.tadic.pdf
Karami,S , Mohammad Khani,M R and Tayyeb,M . (2022). Assassination of Sardar Soleimani from the Perspective of Legal Principles and Rules. Defense Policy, 31(118), 11-37.
MLA
Karami,S , , Mohammad Khani,M R , and Tayyeb,M . "Assassination of Sardar Soleimani from the Perspective of Legal Principles and Rules", Defense Policy, 31, 118, 2022, 11-37.
HARVARD
Karami S, Mohammad Khani M R, Tayyeb M. (2022). 'Assassination of Sardar Soleimani from the Perspective of Legal Principles and Rules', Defense Policy, 31(118), pp. 11-37.
CHICAGO
S Karami, M R Mohammad Khani and M Tayyeb, "Assassination of Sardar Soleimani from the Perspective of Legal Principles and Rules," Defense Policy, 31 118 (2022): 11-37,
VANCOUVER
Karami S, Mohammad Khani M R, Tayyeb M. Assassination of Sardar Soleimani from the Perspective of Legal Principles and Rules. Defense Policy. 2022;31(118):11-37 (In Persian).