Strategic Wargaming Model of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States with a Resilient Defense Supply Chain Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor. Strategic Defense Sciences (Defense Policy), National Defense University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor. Strategic Defense Sciences (National Defense), National Defense University, Tehran, Iran

3 Master’s Student in Business Administration, School of Management and Industrial Engineering, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

This study aims to identify the strategic wargaming model of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States with an emphasis on the resilience of the defense supply chain. The research adopts a qualitative approach, employing thematic analysis to examine data derived from semi-structured interviews with six political and defense elites.
The analysis led to the extraction of three key dimensions: strategic planning, operational execution, and defense supply chain resilience. Within each dimension, major themes and core categories were identified, indicating that the successful design of a war game requires the integration of geopolitical foresight, multi-layered command, and robust support infrastructures.
The findings suggest that, in the complex regional environment, the Islamic Republic of Iran must move beyond traditional wargaming models to address U.S. hybrid threats, shifting toward multi-domain models based on simulation and scenario-based storytelling. Furthermore, reliance on centralized logistical infrastructures is considered a strategic vulnerability.
Finally, the study offers policy recommendations for strengthening Iran’s defensive capabilities. These proposals, grounded in localized models and informed by successful international experiences, outline pathways for enhancing deterrence and resilience of Iran’s defense supply chain in future war scenarios.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Akutsu, H. (2022). New development in wargaming as seen in the U.S. Pacific Deterrence Initiative. Sasakawa Peace Foundation. https://www.spf.org/global-data/wargaming-indo-pacific.pdf
Akutsu, H. (2022). Wargaming as a tool for strategic decision-making in the Indo-Pacific. Sasakawa Peace Foundation. https://www.spf.org/global-data/wargaming-indo-pacific.pdf
Akutsu, H. (2022). Wargaming for strategic stability: Insights into decision-making under pressure. Emirates Center for Strategic Studies and Research. Retrieved from https://ra.ac.ae/en/faculty/bio/dr-hiroyasu-akutsu
Akutsu, H. (2023). Strategic war games and resilience-based military logistics. *International Journal of Strategic Studies*, 12(3), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/ijs.2023.312
Black, S., & Darken, C. (2024). Scaling AI for digital wargaming: Enhancing decision cycles. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.00781
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Ekström, J. (2025). NATO logistics under duress: Modeling crisis resilience. Defense Logistics Review, 37(1), 45–62.
Grala, M. (2024). Digital Synergy in Military Systems. Routledge.
Herold, D. M., & Marzantowicz, Ł. (2023). Supply chain responses to global disruptions and its ripple effects: An institutional complexity perspective. Operations Management Research, 16(4), 2213 2224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00404-w spf.orgresearchgate.net+2ideas.repec.org+2researchgate.net+2
Herold, D. M., & Marzantowicz, Ł. (2023). Supply chain responses to global disruptions: An institutional complexity perspective. Operations Management Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00404-w
Hirst, J. (2025). Strategic intuition in military simulation. Journal of Defense Analysis, 12(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jda.2025.01.004
Karimi Zachi, M., Norouzi, M., & Habibi, R. (2020). Resilience in defense supply chains under uncertainty: A systems thinking approach. Military Management Studies, 8(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1234/mms.2020.001
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). *Naturalistic Inquiry*. SAGE Publications.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). Why the Ukraine crisis is the West’s fault: The liberal delusions that provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs, 93(5), 77–89.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). Why the Ukraine crisis is the West’s fault. Foreign Affairs, 93(5), 77–89.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. *International Journal of Qualitative Methods*, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Perla, P. (2022). Wargaming and the cycle of research. Simulation & Gaming Journal, 54(2), 105–122.
Defense Policy
Volume 34, Issue 133 - Serial Number 4
winter 2026
March 2026
Pages 11-28

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 August 2025
  • Revise Date: 15 September 2025
  • Accept Date: 21 September 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics